Featured Stories

Retreat Yourself

Retreat Yourself

by Haley B. Brown (Center for Justice Legal Intern/Women Leading With Purpose Retreat Attendee ‘16)

As I drove up to Coeur D’Alene with two of my classmates for a weekend away from law school, I started to panic. We all started to panic.

“Did you get all of your reading done for next week?”

“I already feel behind not spending my weekend at the library”

“How will I be able to get ahead of my reading schedule now?”

“I’m too busy to be here.”

But, as we forced ourselves to chat about things outside the realm of law school over sour gummy candy, with the view of CDA Lake fast approaching, that panic began to melt away.

The Women Leading with Purpose Retreat is an annual event run through the Center for Justice for female law students at Gonzaga University School of Law. The Retreat provides those that decide to attend a weekend away from law school on the beautiful CDA lake, little to no cell service, time for personal reflection, relationship building, and much more.

I had just completed my first semester of law school at Gonzaga when I attended the retreat, and had already convinced myself that it was going to be a lonely, miserable three years. All of my free-time that I once filled with hobbies that enriched my life seemed to vanish. I rarely saw my husband and all of my girlfriends were now states away. (Not to mention, on top of figuring out my first semester of law school I was in the midst of trying to learn how to drive my husband’s car, a manual 5-speed, after we sold my vehicle to save money for school. This was like the least amount of fun I have ever had in my entire life. . . but, I digress.) Law school was all consuming; it consumed all of my time, all of my thoughts and all of my conversations. I didn’t feel like myself and was experiencing more self-doubt that I ever had before. To top it all off, I was convinced I was the only one of my classmates who was experiencing this. Most people seemed like they had it all figured out.

The Retreat taught me that law school doesn’t have to be lonely or miserable. In fact, I learned that I was surrounded by strong, supportive female classmates who had experiences just like mine that will enrich my law school experience and provide me a shoulder to lean on, cry on, or stand on if necessary. But, had it not been for the retreat, I am not sure I would have had the chance (or the courage), to get to know the 11 classmates I spent my weekend with on the deep personal level that I did. Until that time, most conversations I had with these women and all of my other classmates were school related and surface level. I left that weekend more committed to developing deep, personal relationships in school, work and in my personal life.

Additionally, being at the retreat afforded me the time to look inward, reflect and morph back into the person that I was before coming to law school. I left feeling more like myself with a renewed sense of purpose, a louder voice, and a reminder of why I chose to come to law school in the first place. I also left committed to learning how to bake bread, something I had been continually putting off with criminal law reading.

Like all good things, the retreat had to come to an end. As my two classmates and I headed back to the reading, outlines, flashcards, and significant others that awaited our return, not one of us felt panicked. Instead, we felt and continue to feel empowered and driven to be women leading with purpose.

Rise for Justice results & more!

We are almost speechless! The Center for Justice hosted its very first Rise for Justice breakfast on May 19th at the Davenport Grand Hotel. The event results are above and beyond what we could have hoped for! Here is quick recap of the proceedings. The event began at 7:30 am with a welcome and thank you from Matt Santangelo. Matt is the Executive Director for Spokane Hoopfest Association and we were very grateful for his willingness to act as our Master of Ceremonies for this event. With 435 guests in attendance, the room was full of passionate community members who care about social justice issues in Spokane. Several elected officials and judges were also in attendance as well, each of whom were recognized during Matt’s introduction. Following the introduction, our Executive Director, Rick Eichstaedt, was introduced and then recognized the Board of Directors and table hosts for their efforts, concluding with an introduction of our notable keynote speaker, Justice Mary I. Yu. She spoke about the need for civil legal aid in Washington and the importance of organizations like the Center as key players in the community. She referred to Spokane as a “beacon of hope” for the rest of the state, and touched on the importance of the work being done by the center here in Spokane. Following her speech, Matt came back up to thank Justice Yu and then to introduce a video produced by Hamilton Studio that gave a wonderful synopsis of the work done at the Center. The 12 minute video featured attorneys and program staff members and demonstrated all of the ways the Center interacts in the community. Following the video, Sharon Smith took the stage and gave a compelling and heartfelt call to action. Once Sharon had finished and instructed table hosts on how to collect donations, Matt gave another thank you to all of the attendees and concluded the event with an inspirational quote from Dr. Cornell West: “Justice is what LOVE looks like in public.”

The event was an overwhelming success, with a net profit of approximately $43,500, exceeding the amount we had anticipated and the goal previously set. The 54 table hosts all did a fantastic job and filled their tables with generous and interested community members!

This event would not have been possible without our hard working event committee that consisted of Elsa Distelhorst, Patty Gates, Kim Harmson, Jake Krummel, and Lorna St. John. A special thank you as well to our table sponsors, Mary Alberts, Micheal Chappell, Elsa Distelhorst, Foster Pepper PLLC,  Kim and Jeff Harmson, Kalispel Tribe and Northern Quest Resort & Casino, Merriman Wealth Management, Neighborhood Alliance of Spokane County, Numerica Credit Union, and Smith-Barbieri Progressive Fund. We would like to send a special shout out to our Media Partner, Don Hamilton and Lorna St. John from Hamilton Studio and our video host, Jake Krummel of Numerica, for the impressive video! We are also grateful to Robert Lee, Della Higgins, Bill Keizer, Dr. Darin Neven and Ben Stuckart for their openness to celebrate and share our work with the community. Finally, a huge thank you to our friend and sponsor, Sharon Smith, for leading the vital community call to action.

In case you missed it…check out the video below!

 

 

Fair Chance Hiring

By Julie Schaffer

March 2016

“Fair Chance Hiring,” also known as “Ban the Box,” is finally getting some much deserved airtime in Spokane. This is welcome news to the 1 in 4 individuals who have a criminal record and who desperately want to tell potential employers why they are the best pick for the job, an opportunity many of them do not get because of the box on the application that asks about criminal history.  Research shows that people who check the box rarely move forward in the hiring process, regardless of whether or not they qualify for the job, how long ago their conviction was, what it was for, or what they’ve done since that time.  To prevent this arbitrary rejection, and to ensure that employers are not missing out on undiscovered talent, 21 states and over 100 jurisdictions have mandated that employers delay asking about criminal history until later in the hiring process – ideally until after the applicant pool has been narrowed based on qualifications and after face-to-face interviews.  Under such policies, employers can still do background checks, they can still ask applicants about their criminal history, and they can still hire the best fit for the job.

Most policies apply to public employers (like City of Spokane’s current policy), but more and more jurisdictions are mandating that private employers comply as well. Why?  Because it’s the right thing to do (we used to allow businesses to disqualify people of color and women), it increases public safety by dramatically reducing the chance that someone will commit another crime, reduces reliance on public benefits, increases the tax base and helps the local economy, ensures that employers aren’t missing out on highly qualified employees, reduces costs related to incarceration, reduces racial disparity in hiring (people of color are disproportionately represented in the criminal justice system and therefore suffer more from “the box,” and it allows people who have served their time to return to our community and help us make it thrive.

We are pleased that our city councilmembers are currently exploring whether to require private employers in Spokane to delay background checks until after the initial application stage, something the City has been doing (without incident) for the past year. City Council hosted a Fair Chance Hiring Forum on March 8 to educate themselves and the community more about this issue.  Councilmembers Stuckart and Beggs organized the forum, along with Smart Justice Spokane member orgs CFJ, PJALs and I Did the Time.  District Court Judge Richard Leland graciously moderated with humor and a genuine interest in how this relates to the cycle of crime he sees every day on the bench.  Approximately 100 people showed up (during the Gonzaga WCC championship game!), and it played live on City Cable 5 (Forum Video).  A WSU PhD student presented research showing that employment dramatically reduces crime, CFJ presented the common elements of fair chance hiring laws, and formerly incarcerated individuals courageously shared their personal stories of healing, change, education, and then heartbreaking rejection by ‘the box.”  The evening ended with a diverse panel of business people who have voluntarily removed the box with great results, the City’s Chief Civil Service Examiner who is implementing the City’s Fair Chance Hiring policy, GSI’s new CEO Todd Mielke, and the leader of I Did the Time Layne Pavey.  The discussion was rich and honest, and I believe it demonstrated that there is enough common ground and shared love for this community to create fair hiring in Spokane.

To learn more, visit www.nelp.org/campaign/ensuring-fair-chance-to-work, and watch the Forum Video.  And please spread the word and tell council members what you think (their emails are below).  Our leaders need to hear that the people in this community support Fair Chance Hiring!

Ben Stuckart [email protected]

Amber Waldref [email protected]

Mike Fagan  [email protected]

Candace Mumm [email protected]

Karen Stratton   [email protected]

Lori Kinnear   [email protected]

Breean Beggs   [email protected]

Hurt lingers 10 years after Zehm’s death

By Jeffry Finer / Special to The Spokesman-Review

I remember Otto Zehm.

Working downtown, I would see him from time to time walking, loping really – he walked fast and bounced from step to step – but I never so much as said hello. I did not know he was a musician, or that he had mental illness, that he sometimes heard things the rest of us didn’t. I knew he had the longest golden hair of anyone on the Spokane street scene. And he sang quietly to himself. He smiled but did not seem to want attention. He moved along in his own world. He’d be surprised what his name has come to mean. And how often city leaders and media cite his life and death.

For Spokane, his name evokes strong reactions.

Some see Otto’s death on a personal level. He was beloved by his family (mother, sister and cousins were closest). He was respected and liked at work (at the nonprofit Skils’kin, where he was a janitor). Friends said he was careless with generosity and would give you his only coat if he saw you were cold. Everyone knew him to be gentle.

Most of Spokane, of course, knows about his death in 2006 after two days on life support. We watched local media play and replay his videotaped beating and restraint by a half-dozen local police officers. We know about the City Hall cover-up, the federal criminal case and Officer Karl Thompson’s conviction.

For some of us, the “system worked.” For others, the aftermath of Otto’s death was a system failure that ruined a good cop.

If you voted in February 2013 for Proposition 1, and 70 percent of Spokane voters did, you remember Otto as the poster child for passage of a strongly worded demand for an independent police ombudsman. And unless you’ve been living under a rock, you know the office of the ombudsman is in tatters.

Spokane tries to move on.

Officer Thompson has served his time and just this month has been released. The Use of Force Commission met for a year, issued two dozen specific recommendations and dissolved. Some recommendations have taken hold; others, such as changes to Spokane’s “police culture,” have not.

Local civil rights advocates press on – working hard to see that we get the independent ombudsman we overwhelmingly voted for, moving “smart justice” reforms ahead to fix our broken criminal justice system, and pushing the city to hire a new chief of police who is committed to implement the changes our community needs. Other law enforcement issues have come under scrutiny, such as the understaffed jail, its lack of nurses and timely medical services. Just more budget-driven problems facing us and every city and county in America.

Overall? We have yet to heal our relationship with our own peace officers. They have yet to heal their relationship with us.

On the day Officer Thompson was taken into custody, the Friday after the verdict finding him guilty of excessive force and lying in a federal investigation, I sat in the gallery behind Assistant Chief Craig Meidl. He and some four dozen men and women – off-duty police officers sworn to uphold the law – snapped to salute as federal marshals led Officer Thompson away. Otto’s middle-age cousins seated with me were stunned into silence. We looked for help but the court had left and its staff seemed powerless.

In 30 years, I’ve never felt such repressed tension in a courtroom. The marshals, wisely I think, took Thompson away uncuffed and the officers gradually left the courtroom. My apology to the Zehm cousins for the salute brought a cold stare from two officers. At the elevator, another officer blamed the sole reporter present for causing Thompson’s conviction.

It is said that no one should be judged solely by their worst day; and in that sense Officer Thompson’s supporters may have been feeling a conflicted affinity for him. But it remains troubling that the department has failed to account to the public for the embrace by 50 of its officers of a convicted felon. Troubling that there has been no apology and no consequences.

A lot needs doing to restore our faith and trust in our police. Their work requires such trust as surely as we require faithful police. The Center for Justice, where I work with a team of lawyers and community activists, coordinates with citizens, police and local officials to make our city safer and fairer for everyone.

Sometimes the struggle goes on quietly in meetings, or noisily in the media. But a certain spirit of gentleness inspires us at times to keep a memory of Otto Zehm alive. Not only as saber-rattling social change warriors but as neighbors, colleagues, friends and people who remember Otto Zehm.

Medical-Legal Partnerships: A Comprehensive Problem Requiring a Comprehensive Solution

MLP Image copy for blog

A huge thanks to our intern, Jerusha Dressel of Whitworth University, for researching and writing this blog post about one of our newest program areas, the Health & Justice Initiative.

 

Medical-Legal Partnerships: A Comprehensive Problem Requiring a Comprehensive Solution

Health care staff at Boston Medical Center, in the winter of 2010, found themselves faced with a problem that appeared to be propagating itself: patients living in sub-standard housing and suffering from chronic diseases would come in to receive treatment only to afterwards return to the same conditions, such as lack of heat, that initially provoked the issue.

It is evident how this could quickly become a self-perpetuating cycle:

  • A patient becomes ill due to asthma complications and consequently cannot go into work.
  • The individual loses income and cannot pay their utilities for the month.
  • The patient’s heat is turned off in their apartment, worsening the asthma issues.

Although regulations in Boston were set up to prevent those suffering from chronic conditions from having utilities turned off, they required paperwork to be filled out by the doctors themselves. Utilizing the resources provided by a medical-legal partnership (MLP), workers at Boston Medical Center were able to ensure that patients were receiving the legal protection they were entitled to under the law. Medical staff, though, found themselves overwhelmed with the paperwork from the massive amounts of individuals in need of a certification to keep their utilities from being turned off. Working as a team, medical and legal professionals were able to encourage regulation changes that lessened the paperwork required to guarantee legal protections for those dealing with certain medical issues. Because of the efforts of this MLP, 10,000 individuals with asthma and 400 with sickle cell are now less likely to need to visit a health care professional as a result of complications from their conditions and the burden on health care providers has been lessened.[1]

Problems similar to those faced by Boston Medical Center occur regularly. Health care and legal professionals employ different perspectives on patient-client issues. Health care professionals concern themselves with the medical side of the problem (e.g. helping the patient recover), whereas legal workers deal with the “justice” side of the issue (e.g. mold in an apartment building in violation of city code).[2] While both are working with aspects of the issue, they have not seen it as one broad issue, or even if they have, they have not been able to find a means to successfully, holistically combat the problem.

The problem facing health care and legal workers is like a puzzle. However, instead of being all together in the same box, the pieces are distributed to different individuals who have no interaction with one another. The lawyer has his or her group of pieces and can assemble a good portion of the puzzle to provide part of a solution, yet the lawyer has no clue as to what the doctor’s portion of the pieces look like and vice-versa. Thus, as much as these individuals may attempt to finish the puzzle and solve the problem, they cannot succeed because they are both lacking critical components. MLPs represent an effort to bring together all of the puzzle pieces.

According to the Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Undeserved: “Medical-legal partnerships (MLPs) seek to eliminate barriers to healthcare and improve the health of vulnerable and underserved populations by integrating legal assistance into the medical setting. These partnerships resolve various legal needs related to health (including medical insurance, Social Security benefits, housing, employment, and family problems) by affording medical patients the benefits and protections of legal services.”[3]

Basically, MLPs represent a partnership of legal and medical professionals. These organizations provide legal aid to patients suffering from chronic diseases. According to the National Center for Medical-Legal Partnership, MLPs have four different avenues through which they further their goal:

  1. They teach health care and legal professionals how to together recognize potential health threats in the patient’s social environment before they become major issues.
  2. MLPs use laws in place to combat these health threats.
  3. The organizations strive to alter the policies of health care providers so that they are more readily equipped to react to potential health threats to the patent.
  4. These institutions make an effort to preclude additional health hazards through the implementation of new rules regarding health issues.[4]

Today there are more than 275 MLPs stretched across thirty-eight states in the U.S., the majority existing in suburban areas. They are legal aid, changes to health and legal organizations and modification of regulations.[5] These groups place “lawyers and paralegals alongside health care teams to detect, address and prevent health-harming social conditions for people and communities.”[6] MLPs increase medical professionals’ awareness of the consequences of the legal structure on the individual’s health care while opening up the eyes of lawyers to the potential benefits of addressing problems before they become major issues

There have been several positive results of this partnership between medical and legal professionals. Among other benefits, the National Center for Medical-Legal Partnership noted that individuals suffering from chronic diseases are “admitted to the hospital less frequently,” patients more regularly ingest prescribed medication and health care costs have been reduced for the patient and the health care provider.[7] The results of a study examining the impacts of rural MLPs revealed an over three hundred percent return on investment of the Medical-Legal Partnership of Southern Illinois over the course of three years.[8]

MLPs present a viable solution to very real problems facing individuals today. Ellen Lawton, director of the National Center for Medical-Legal Partnership at George Washington University, summed up the importance of a partnership between legal and health care professionals such as the one that exists in MLPs saying that, “As we focus on how to build healthier communities over the next 50 years, we must remember that health does not exist in a vacuum separate from wealth, from the laws we write, from the systems we create to protect our citizens, or from the injustices that exist in each of these things. We must aim for health and justice in all practices and in all policies, knowing that more often than not, they are the same thing.”[9] In order to tackle this self-perpetuating problem, it must be approached not as two separate problems, one for lawyers and one for health professionals, but rather as one single issue. MLPs represent the partnering of individuals working in separate fields towards the same ends.

[1] “Changing the law to keep the heat and lights on,” National Center for Medical-Legal Partnership, November 1, 2010, http://medical-legalpartnership.org/utility-story/.
[2] “The Need for Medical-Legal Partnership,” National Center for Medical-Legal Partnership, accessed February 1, 2016, http://medical-legalpartnership.org/need/.
[3] James A. Teufel, Danilea Werner, Diane Goffinet, Woody Thorne, Stephen L. Brown, and Lori Gettinger, “Rural Medical-Legal Partnership and Advocacy: A Three-Year Follow-up Study,” Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved 23, no. 2 (2012): 705-714, doi: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0038.
[4] “The MLP Response,” National Center for Medical-Legal Partnership, accessed February 1, 2016, http://medical-legalpartnership.org/mlp-response/.
[5] Tishra Beeson, Brittany Dawn McAllister and Marsha Regenstein, “Making the Case for Medical-Legal Partnerships: A Review of the Evidence,” National Center for Medical-Legal Partnership, February 2013,  accessed February 8, 2016, http://medical-legalpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Medical-Legal-Partnership-Literature-Review-February-2013.pdf.
[6] “The MLP Response.”
[7] “Impact at a Glance,” National Center for Medical-Legal Partnership, accessed February 1, 2016, http://medical-legalpartnership.org/mlp-response/impact/; “FAQ,” National Center for Medical-Legal Partnership, accessed February 8, 2016, http://medical-legalpartnership.org/faq/.
[8] James A. Teufel, Danilea Werner, Diane Goffinet, Woody Thorne, Stephen L. Brown, and Lori Gettinger, 705-714.
[9] Ellen Lawton, “The Shared DNA of Health and Justice,” Huffington Post (blog), August 25, 2015 (4:05 p.m.), http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ellen-lawton/the-shared-dna-of-health-and-justice_b_8034788.html.